Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Registration & Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Valid Test Testking

Blog Article

Tags: Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Registration, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Valid Test Testking, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Latest Exam Practice, Certification Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Training, Test Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Registration

One thing has to admit, more and more certifications you own, it may bring you more opportunities to obtain better job, earn more salary. This is the reason that we need to recognize the importance of getting the test Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certifications. More qualified certification for our future employment has the effect to be reckoned with, only to have enough qualification certifications to prove their ability, can we win over rivals in the social competition. Therefore, the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Guide Torrent can help users pass the qualifying examinations that they are required to participate in faster and more efficiently.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.
Topic 2	Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.
Topic 3	Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.
Topic 4	Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.
Topic 5	Design Applications: The topic focuses on designing a prompt that elicits a specifically formatted response. It also focuses on selecting model tasks to accomplish a given business requirement. Lastly, the topic covers chain components for a desired model input and output.

>> Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Registration <<

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Valid Test Testking, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Latest Exam Practice

As is known to us, perfect after-sales service for buyers is a very high value. Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Guide Torrent not only has the high quality and efficiency but also the perfect service system after sale. Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions can help you save much time, if you use our products, you just need to spend 20-30 hours on learning, and you will pass your exam successfully. What most important is that you can download our study materials about 5~10 minutes after you purchase.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q46-Q51):

NEW QUESTION # 46
A Generative Al Engineer has successfully ingested unstructured documents and chunked them by document sections. They would like to store the chunks in a Vector Search index. The current format of the dataframe has two columns: (i) original document file name (ii) an array of text chunks for each document.
What is the most performant way to store this dataframe?

A. Store each chunk as an independent JSON file in Unity Catalog Volume. For each JSON file, the key is the document section name and the value is the array of text chunks for that section
B. Flatten the dataframe to one chunk per row, create a unique identifier for each row, and save to a Delta table
C. First create a unique identifier for each document, then save to a Delta table
D. Split the data into train and test set, create a unique identifier for each document, then save to a Delta table

Answer: B

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs an efficient way to store chunks of unstructured documents to facilitate easy retrieval and search. The current dataframe consists of document filenames and associated text chunks.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Splitting into train and test sets is more relevant for model training scenarios and not directly applicable to storage for retrieval in a Vector Search index.
* Option B: Flattening the dataframe such that each row contains a single chunk with a unique identifier is the most performant for storage and retrieval. This structure aligns well with how data is indexed and queried in vector search applications, making it easier to retrieve specific chunks efficiently.
* Option C: Creating a unique identifier for each document only does not address the need to access individual chunks efficiently, which is critical in a Vector Search application.
* Option D: Storing each chunk as an independent JSON file creates unnecessary overhead and complexity in managing and querying large volumes of files.
OptionBis the most efficient and practical approach, allowing for streamlined indexing and retrieval processes in a Delta table environment, fitting the requirements of a Vector Search index.

NEW QUESTION # 47
A company has a typical RAG-enabled, customer-facing chatbot on its website.

Select the correct sequence of components a user's questions will go through before the final output is returned. Use the diagram above for reference.

A. 1.response-generating LLM, 2.vector search, 3.context-augmented prompt, 4.embedding model
B. 1.response-generating LLM, 2.context-augmented prompt, 3.vector search, 4.embedding model
C. 1.context-augmented prompt, 2.vector search, 3.embedding model, 4.response-generating LLM
D. 1.embedding model, 2.vector search, 3.context-augmented prompt, 4.response-generating LLM

Answer: D

Explanation:
To understand how a typical RAG-enabled customer-facing chatbot processes a user's question, let's go through the correct sequence as depicted in the diagram and explained in option A:
* Embedding Model (1):The first step involves the user's question being processed through an embedding model. This model converts the text into a vector format that numerically represents the text. This step is essential for allowing the subsequent vector search to operate effectively.
* Vector Search (2):The vectors generated by the embedding model are then used in a vector search mechanism. This search identifies the most relevant documents or previously answered questions that are stored in a vector format in a database.
* Context-Augmented Prompt (3):The information retrieved from the vector search is used to create a context-augmented prompt. This step involves enhancing the basic user query with additional relevant information gathered to ensure the generated response is as accurate and informative as possible.
* Response-Generating LLM (4):Finally, the context-augmented prompt is fed into a response- generating large language model (LLM). This LLM uses the prompt to generate a coherent and contextually appropriate answer, which is then delivered as the final output to the user.
Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* B, C, D: These options suggest incorrect sequences that do not align with how a RAG system typically processes queries. They misplace the role of embedding models, vector search, and response generation in an order that would not facilitate effective information retrieval and response generation.
Thus, the correct sequence isembedding model, vector search, context-augmented prompt, response- generating LLM, which is option A.

NEW QUESTION # 48
A Generative Al Engineer needs to design an LLM pipeline to conduct multi-stage reasoning that leverages external tools. To be effective at this, the LLM will need to plan and adapt actions while performing complex reasoning tasks.
Which approach will do this?

A. Encourage the LLM to make multiple API calls in sequence without planning or structuring the calls, allowing the LLM to decide when and how to use external tools spontaneously.
B. Use a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting technique to guide the LLM through a series of reasoning steps, then manually input the results from external tools for the final answer.
C. Implement a framework like ReAct which allows the LLM to generate reasoning traces and perform task-specific actions that leverage external tools if necessary.
D. Tram the LLM to generate a single, comprehensive response without interacting with any external tools, relying solely on its pre-trained knowledge.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The task requires an LLM pipeline for multi-stage reasoning with external tools, necessitating planning, adaptability, and complex reasoning. Let's evaluate the options based on Databricks' recommendations for advanced LLM workflows.
* Option A: Train the LLM to generate a single, comprehensive response without interacting with any external tools, relying solely on its pre-trained knowledge
* This approach limits the LLM to its static knowledge base, excluding external tools and multi- stage reasoning. It can't adapt or plan actions dynamically, failing the requirements.
* Databricks Reference:"External tools enhance LLM capabilities beyond pre-trained knowledge" ("Building LLM Applications with Databricks," 2023).
* Option B: Implement a framework like ReAct which allows the LLM to generate reasoning traces and perform task-specific actions that leverage external tools if necessary
* ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) combines reasoning traces (step-by-step logic) with actions (e.g., tool calls), enabling the LLM to plan, adapt, and execute complex tasks iteratively. This meets all requirements: multi-stage reasoning, tool use, and adaptability.
* Databricks Reference:"Frameworks like ReAct enable LLMs to interleave reasoning and external tool interactions for complex problem-solving"("Generative AI Cookbook," 2023).
* Option C: Encourage the LLM to make multiple API calls in sequence without planning or structuring the calls, allowing the LLM to decide when and how to use external tools spontaneously
* Unstructured, spontaneous API calls lack planning and may lead to inefficient or incorrect tool usage. This doesn't ensure effective multi-stage reasoning or adaptability.
* Databricks Reference: Structured frameworks are preferred:"Ad-hoc tool calls can reduce reliability in complex tasks"("Building LLM-Powered Applications").
* Option D: Use a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting technique to guide the LLM through a series of reasoning steps, then manually input the results from external tools for the final answer
* CoT improves reasoning but relies on manual tool interaction, breaking automation and adaptability. It's not a scalable pipeline solution.
* Databricks Reference:"Manual intervention is impractical for production LLM pipelines" ("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
Conclusion: Option B (ReAct) is the best approach, as it integrates reasoning and tool use in a structured, adaptive framework, aligning with Databricks' guidance for complex LLM workflows.

NEW QUESTION # 49
A Generative AI Engineer developed an LLM application using the provisioned throughput Foundation Model API. Now that the application is ready to be deployed, they realize their volume of requests are not sufficiently high enough to create their own provisioned throughput endpoint. They want to choose a strategy that ensures the best cost-effectiveness for their application.
What strategy should the Generative AI Engineer use?

A. Change to a model with a fewer number of parameters in order to reduce hardware constraint issues
B. Deploy the model using pay-per-token throughput as it comes with cost guarantees
C. Switch to using External Models instead
D. Throttle the incoming batch of requests manually to avoid rate limiting issues

Answer: B

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs a cost-effective deployment strategy for an LLM application with relatively low request volume.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Switching to external models may not provide the required control or integration necessary for specific application needs.
* Option B: Using a pay-per-token model is cost-effective, especially for applications with variable or low request volumes, as it aligns costs directly with usage.
* Option C: Changing to a model with fewer parameters could reduce costs, but might also impact the performance and capabilities of the application.
* Option D: Manually throttling requests is a less efficient and potentially error-prone strategy for managing costs.
OptionBis ideal, offering flexibility and cost control, aligning expenses directly with the application's usage patterns.

NEW QUESTION # 50
A Generative AI Engineer has been asked to build an LLM-based question-answering application. The application should take into account new documents that are frequently published. The engineer wants to build this application with the least cost and least development effort and have it operate at the lowest cost possible.
Which combination of chaining components and configuration meets these requirements?

A. For the question-answering application, prompt engineering and an LLM are required to generate answers.
B. The LLM needs to be frequently with the new documents in order to provide most up-to-date answers.
C. For the application a prompt, an agent and a fine-tuned LLM are required. The agent is used by the LLM to retrieve relevant content that is inserted into the prompt which is given to the LLM to generate answers.
D. For the application a prompt, a retriever, and an LLM are required. The retriever output is inserted into the prompt which is given to the LLM to generate answers.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Problem Context: The task is to build an LLM-based question-answering application that integrates new documents frequently with minimal costs and development efforts.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Utilizes a prompt and a retriever, with the retriever output being fed into the LLM. This setup is efficient because it dynamically updates the data pool via the retriever, allowing the LLM to provide up-to-date answers based on the latest documents without needing tofrequently retrain the model. This method offers a balance of cost-effectiveness and functionality.
* Option B: Requires frequent retraining of the LLM, which is costly and labor-intensive.
* Option C: Only involves prompt engineering and an LLM, which may not adequately handle the requirement for incorporating new documents unless it's part of an ongoing retraining or updating mechanism, which would increase costs.
* Option D: Involves an agent and a fine-tuned LLM, which could be overkill and lead to higher development and operational costs.
Option Ais the most suitable as it provides a cost-effective, minimal development approach while ensuring the application remains up-to-date with new information.

NEW QUESTION # 51
......

Our Lead2Passed website has a long history of providing Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate test training materials. With many years'hard work, our passing rate of Lead2Passed's Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam has achieved 100%. In order to make sure that the accuracy of Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate test of Lead2Passed, our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate test training materials are continuing update. If you purchase our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps, we will offer one year-free update service.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Valid Test Testking: https://www.lead2passed.com/Databricks/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-practice-exam-dumps.html

Report this page

LATEST DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE EXAM REGISTRATION & DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE VALID TEST TESTKING

Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Registration & Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Valid Test Testking